As the shadow of ruthless authoritarian regimes falls across the world’s continents from Europe to America North and South to Asia, the world’s capitalists have greeted with undisguised jubilation the victory of Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party in India’s recent general election, winning 303 of the Lok Sabha’s (lower house) 543 seats, as against their main rivals’ Congress 52.
They have for decades been greedily eyeing the massive internal markets of India in their search for potential outlets for investment. Since the crash of 2008 and the subsequent long recession, huge reserves of capital are swilling around the world economy searching for a profitable niche, as opportunities become exhausted. The emergence of the so-called BRICS economies seemed to offer a new route to profitable investment.
In recent years, however, these expectations have sunk. China’s economy is slowing down, Brazil is sinking into stagflation, South Africa is riven with corruption, and Russia is in recession, hobbled by Western sanctions and falling oil prices. In India, the election in 2014 of the free-market bandit Narendra Modi appeared to them a godsend. The draconic so-called “reforms” that started in 1991, involving privatisations and cuts in subsidies and protectionism, had stumbled to a halt; but world capitalism now salivated with hungry expectations of the prospects that might open up in an India under the rule of Modi, with his well-earned reputation for gangster ruthlessness.
For big business, the justification for the euphoria lay in Modi’s record as chief minister of the state of Gujarat between 2002 and 2010, when he presided over an average growth rate of 16.6% a year. The truth, however, is that Gujarat’s rapid growth actually pre-dated Modi by a whole decade: it had already been the fastest-growing of India’s fourteen major states between 1991 and 1998. Moreover, even during Modi’s tenure of office, Gujarat was not in fact India’s fastest-growing state: its record was exceeded by Uttarkhand and Sikkim.
Gujarat’s rapid rate of development was based mainly on Modi’s policy of sweeping away the few remaining vestiges of state regulation to attract foreign direct investment. Modi called his state the “global gateway to India”. But even by the measure of FDI inflows, Gujarat’s economy remained dwarfed by other traditional havens for foreign investment, such as Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu.
Modi’s economic policies
Since coming to office, Modi’s policies have actually proved capricious and impulsive. On taking office, without warning, in what was called “the biggest path-breaking and the most radical changes in the FDI regime ever undertaken”, he suddenly opened up a dozen new industries to foreign direct investment (FDI). And yet the effects have been unspectacular. While according to Modi India is “the most open economy in the world for FDI”, investors still complain that bureaucratic red tape and a miserable infrastructure put India 130th out of 189 countries in the World Bank’s “ease of doing business” rankings; that getting a permit to build a warehouse in Mumbai involves forty steps and costs more than 25% of its value, compared with less than 2% in the more streamlined countries; and that it takes 1,420 days, on average, to enforce a contract. And still today – after successive grandiose proclamations stretching over a quarter century of free-market liberalisation by successive prime ministers Narasimha Rao, Manmohan Singh, Vajpayee and Narendra Modi, India’s nationalised banks still hold 70% of banking assets (according to the Economist, “stuffed with bad loans”), and the state still owns insurance companies, an airline, a chain of hotels, and several industrial enterprises.
A more glaring example still of Modi’s unpredictably volatile performance came in 2016 with his sudden announcement without warning that all Rs 500 and Rs 1000 currency notes – 86% of all cash in circulation! – were to be demonetised overnight. This was proclaimed a strike against the proliferation of counterfeit notes (blamed, of course, on Pakistan) which was allegedly “fuelling the drug trade” and “funding terrorism”. Its real target was the untold circulation of “black money” still swilling around the economy.
As usual, however, while this measure hit the small-time cheats who still buy gold or expensive properties with suitcases stuffed with illicit cash, it left scot-free Modi’s billionaire friends who have always stashed their loot away in numbered foreign bank accounts, or who can afford to hire middlemen to deposit dodgy banknotes into their own accounts for a tip. Meanwhile, it caused havoc to the ordinary hard-working masses, those too poor to have bank accounts: low-paid workers, small farmers, casual labourers, street traders, etc., who have suddenly found themselves holding worthless scraps of paper. After all, informal wages represent just a tenth of those in the formal sector. India has just 49 million income-tax payers out of a population of 1.2 billion.
Above all, Modi imposed further regressive attacks on the population’s already squeezed living standards with a wholesale increase in sales taxes.
India and China
India and China are often bracketed together as the powerhouse of the world economy. However, this coupling is deceptive. Both countries offer huge reserves of cheap labour; but India cannot match the incomparably more developed and efficient infrastructure provided in China by decades of state investment and planning. The fact is that India’s economy is still only one-fifth the size of China’s, and falling fast behind it.
From a high point in 2010-11, when GDP rose by 9.3%, India’s growth rate slumped in just three years to 4.4%, though there has been a slight jump since then. Despite its huge reserves of cheap labour and its enthusiastic adoption of deregulation, the truth is that India with its rickety infrastructure and unstable administration is still an unattractive proposition for international investors. To take one aspect: half of all manufacturers suffer at least five hours of power cuts every week. In World Bank league tables, India ranks 60th in the world in terms of productivity and competitiveness (China is 29th), 134th for “ease of doing business”, and 179th for “suitability for inward investment”.
From cooks and housemaids to typists and filing clerks
Information technology and business process outsourcing are among the fastest growing sectors of the economy, contributing 25% of the country’s total exports in 2007–08. The growth in the IT and software sector – and especially the proliferation of call centres – are largely attributable to the availability of a huge pool of cheap, skilled, English-speaking workers. What this amounts to, however, is that whereas Indians had in the past largely performed the menial services of cooks, housemaids and washerwomen for the British raj, globalisation and digitalisation had now in effect elevated them to the world’s typists, receptionists and filing clerks. By 2009, seven Indian firms were listed among the top fifteen technology outsourcing companies in the world.
As for India’s manufacturing industry, it relies on a combination of cheap labour and new technology, with its textile industries especially dependent upon child labour, from the fields to the mills to the clothing and carpet workshops.
Initially, GDP appeared to be rising at rates even faster than China, though this was achieved partly by devious manipulation of the data used to measure it. In any case, already by now growth rates have slowed down, and industrial growth is currently at a standstill. Net profits of manufacturing companies have fallen in the past year by 18%, and car sales have slumped, refuting early predictions that India might soon overtake Germany and Japan to become the world’s third biggest car market; and demand for bank credit has slowed sharply. According to the economist Michael Roberts, there is a fall in both urban and rural incomes; export growth has been close to zero for the last five years; unemployment is at an all-time high, and the domestic consumer boom is weakening. India is currently grouped together with other rapidly developing economies in the so-called BRICS group (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), but unlike China, which has spectacularly raised general living standards by planed development of its infrastructure, in India, as in Brazil and the rest, growth has benefited just a tiny minority while the mass of workers and peasants continue to languish in poverty.
According to the OECD, income inequality has doubled since the early 1990s. While the top 1% of Indians own more than half the country’s wealth, and the richest 10% have increased their share from 68.8% in 2010 to 77% by 2018, the bottom half own just 4%.
In a desperate attempt to boost profitability and offer the capitalists further incentive to invest, Modi has ruthlessly applied the standard austerity remedy of wholesale privatisation, cuts in food and fuel subsidies and increased sales taxes – policies which grind the already desperately poor still further into misery. India still has the lowest productivity levels in Asia, but as elsewhere, as investment in capital equipment rises relative to labour, the rate of profit has dipped and there is a swelling reserve army of untapped labour. 12 to 15 million young people are entering the workforce each year, only to swell the ranks of the unemployed and destitute.
While accounting only for a quarter of India’s total population, India has a “middle-class” now estimated at 300 million, thus offering a perfectly viable domestic consumer market capable of sustaining the booming growth of recent years. However, the economic “miracle” still leaves a vast majority of peasants and urban poor destitute and living at subsistence level, with about 400 million people in India – one third of India’s population, and one-third also of the world’s total poor – barely surviving below the poverty line of $1.25 per day. Under capitalism it is inconceivable that India can avoid a descent into unimaginable want and despair. Every month, 1.1 million Indians join the labour market. Over the next decade, this will amount to more than 115 million young people, most of them still poorly educated.
Far from bringing prosperity to the people, India’s boom has been confined to a small affluent minority. On the contrary: there has been a substantial widening of the gap between rich and poor, dating from the demolition of price controls and subsidies along with the rest of the economic “reforms” dictated at gunpoint by the IMF and the World Bank in 1991.
It should always be remembered that before colonisation, in 1700 India’s share of world income had equalled that of all Europe combined. By the time it had emerged from the “civilising” benefits of British rule in 1947, India was among the very poorest countries in the world in terms of per capita income.
From independence in 1947 to the new economic turn in 1991, India’s economy had been based upon a high level of state ownership; protectionism; high tariff walls; import and exchange controls; import substitution; interventionist policies; a system of state rationing; and a dependence on favourable trade terms with the Soviet Union. There were even nominal “five-year plans”. At one point, income tax levels – which were always treated in practice as purely hypothetical – were fixed at a maximum of 97.5%. The inevitable outcome was cheating on a massive scale, smuggling, and a wholesale evasion of regulations, exchange controls and taxation – a carnival of rampant bureaucratism, corruption and inefficiency, in which the ruling class routinely violated the rules of its own administration.
The USSR had been India’s major trading partner, and its collapse in 1991, together with the spike in oil prices precipitated by the first Gulf War, created an immediate balance-of-payments crisis for India. Teetering on the brink of an outright overnight default on its loans, India was forced to beg the IMF for a $1.8 billion bailout. The price was instant de-regulation.
There followed a bonfire of state controls. Whether under the Congress governments of Narasimha Rao and Manmohan Singh, or the BJP government of Vajpayee, regulations and subsidies were demolished and India thrown wide open to penetration by the multinationals. An influx of hot money flowed into India, and for a few years it became one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. On the basis of purely abstract fantastical hypothetical projections, it was predicted that India could overtake France and Italy by 2020, Germany, UK and Russia by 2025 and Japan by 2035. It was even projected that India was on course to overtake the USA!
Under the patronage of the British raj, a narrowly-based indigenous capitalist class had already begun to take root in the decades prior to independence. Today such families as the Tatas, Birlas and Mittals are world-stage tycoons. But in the early period of independence, it had suited the Indian ruling class to shelter behind a political aristocracy posing as protector of the minorities; champion of the poor; secular, democratic and even “socialist”. The flimsy pretext for this was its dependence on nationalisation, protectionism, state subsidies, friendly relations with the USSR, and above all its need to secure a home market safe from the constant risk of communal disintegration and national fragmentation.
This was always largely a cynical and hollow facade, though, long abandoned in practice even by Congress. Congress was little more than the cynical political exploiter of the insecurities of the minorities. This can be seen in its true criminal record: the formal and legal institutionalising of caste rivalries in job reservations and the designation of “scheduled castes”; the dictatorial Emergency regime; the regular dismissal of opposition state governments; suppression of national revolts; tolerance of caste atrocities; periodic fostering of communal riots; brutal military repression in Kashmir; successive wars with Pakistan; explicit endorsement of the massacre of Sikhs in 1984, etc…
Narendra Modi’s political vehicle the Bharatiya Janata Party is an explicitly communal Hindu outfit, the political voice of a conglomerate of reactionary and sinister forces. These include the Vishva Hindu Parishad, the Hindu communal movement which provoked conflict throughout India in 1992 by mobilising 150,000 rioters to storm the Babri Masjid mosque at Ayodhya; Shiv Sena, an overtly fascist party modelled on the Nazis and based in Maharashtra, which in early 1993 perpetrated a massacre of 3,000 Muslims in Mumbai in a pre-planned act of ethnic cleansing; and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a five-million strong paramilitary Hindu communal mass movement of which Modi is a lifelong member.
The RSS has five to six million members and over a million organised “volunteers” who hold regular public paramilitary drills. It
was founded in 1925 as a conscious counter-weight to the growing influence of socialist ideas within India’s national liberation movement. It openly praised the ideology of Mussolini and Hitler and identified the Nazi holocaust as its model in its mission to destroy the Muslim community. (India has the second largest Muslim population in the world: more numerous than Pakistan or Bangladesh, and exceeded only by Indonesia.) In the words of one of the founders of the RSS, Golwalkar: “To keep up the purity of the race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here.” It was an RSS member who assassinated Gandhi in 1948.
Modi’s electoral victory in 2014 aroused panic among the crores (in the Indian numerical system, one lakh = 100,000 and one crore = ten million) of India’s minorities and lower castes, and above all by India’s 176 million Muslims. There was ample justification for their alarm in the horror of the Gujarat pogrom of 2002, which was orchestrated by Modi’s government. Up to 2,000 Muslim men, women and children were hacked, burned or bludgeoned to death in an orgy of communal rioting, and 200,000 made homeless, while the police stood aside. Modi’s considered response to this bloodbath was that he felt the same level of regret as he would “if a puppy had been run over by a car”.
For the BJP, a combination of communalism and neoliberalism is nothing new. The previous BJP government under Vajpayee (from 1998 to 2004) had presided over wholesale privatisation of state enterprises. Meanwhile, prior to the Gujarat massacre, BJP cadres along with the VHP and RSS had instigated the provocative destruction of the mosque at Ayodhya, and the subsequent horrifying pogrom in India’s main commercial and industrial metropolis Mumbai in 1993, in which up to 3,000 Muslims were slaughtered in a frenzy of systematic ethnic cleansing,
In this election, Modi had made lavish promises to build a hundred new airports and fifty new city metro systems, and even that by 2030 India would rise from the world’s sixth to its third largest economy. Modi is known to be generous with his promises. Last time round, he had promised to create twenty million new jobs every year. Today, India has its highest rate of unemployment for three decades.
In a recent article, the journalist Kapil Komireddi wrote: “Five years on, we have more than a glimpse of the ‘New India’ he has spawned. It is a reflection of its progenitor: culturally arid, intellectually vacant, emotionally bruised, vain, bitter, boastful, permanently aggrieved and implacably malevolent; a make-believe land full of fudge and fakery, where bigotry against religious minorities is among the therapeutic options available to members of a self-pitying majority frustrated by the prime minister’s failure to upgrade their economic standard of living.”
However, the hands of India’s traditional ruling party Congress are hardly much cleaner. The IMF-imposed programme of privatisation and budget cuts was first introduced in the early 1990s under the Congress administration of Narasimha Rao and further promoted under the world banker Manmohan Singh. Congress had meanwhile long abandoned in practice its always at best ambiguous and hypocritical secular stance. To take just one glaring example: in 1984 it was Congress politicians who had ordered the assault on the Golden Temple at Amritsar and then deliberately orchestrated the massacre of thousands of Sikhs in Delhi and throughout India. Moreover, the grubby fingers of Congress politicians have been no less soiled by scandal than those of their shadow rivals in the BJP, for instance in the ten-million dollar Bofors bribery case.
There is still today just maybe a sliver of difference in the rhetoric of the two rival parties, but hardly a trace of any divergence in policy. The process of wholesale privatisation gained momentum under Congress and BJP governments alike. Similarly, the storming of the mosque at Ayodhya, the worst communal riots since 1947, and the pogrom in Mumbai all took place under the Congress government of Narasimha Rao.
In today’s harsh post-crash world, along with its counterparts worldwide the ruling class has decisively discarded the outworn duplicitous façade of secularism practised so artfully by yesterdays’ Congress hypocrites. In a society graphically polarised between a narrow plutocracy and the destitute masses, a class so manifestly parasitic as the Indian capitalist class has somehow to whip up an artificial mass base. Like every ruling class in its epoch of decay, ultimately its survival depends upon the magical power of myth. Today the symbol of homespun self-sufficiency represented on India’s flag by the spinning wheel is giving way to age-old epic Hindu mythology. True, riots and massacres are messy affairs that tend to get in the way of business. But such passions have a momentum of their own; they can’t be simply switched on and off. It is unfortunate that random eruptions of communal violence may sometimes destabilise order and discipline, but these are the political price paid by the ruling class to stay afloat.
Under capitalism, the population of India faces horror without end: the daily rape and slaughter of women; discrimination and pogroms against religious minorities; the degradation of lower castes and “untouchables”; the constant threat of communal violence, police brutality and victimisation.
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) and its precursor the Communist Party of India have discredited themselves over decades of unprincipled political manoeuvring with the respective rival reactionary parties of the ruling class. Their reward has been a meltdown into near oblivion. At the 2002 elections, the two Communist Parties between them had achieved their highest ever representation in the Lok Sabha: 59 seats. This time round, they suffered their worst-ever result, winning just a pitiful five seats out of a total of 545.
Yet in India just as everywhere else, the last word has yet to be spoken. There is another India. The working class remains a vast, politically untapped and potentially invincible force, and it has not been silent. In the two biggest general strikes in world history, in September 2016 and then again on 8th-9th of January 2019, 200 million workers, men and women, went on strike, marched and rallied throughout the length and breadth of the sub-continent. Ten trade union federations united to call the strike; only the BJP-affiliated “company union” federation opposed and tried to sabotage it. Their 12-point charter included the following demands:
- repeal of repressive labour laws (“stop all pro-corporate, anti-worker amendments”)
- a minimum monthly wage of Rs 18,000 (just over £200 at the official exchange rate); 82% of men and over 92% of women currently earn barely half as much – less than Rs 10,000 per month;
- equal pay for equal work;
- universal social security cover
- a public distribution system for basic essentials;
- compulsory recognition of trade unions;
- an end to privatisation of public sector units;
- provision of social security;
- guaranteed employment;
- a moratorium on farm loans.
The strike gripped every part of India from the industrial metropoli of Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai and Kolkata, reaching from Kashmir to Kerala, from Gujarat to Assam, and stretching even to offshore islands and remote tribal areas. It encompassed workers in the public sector, transport, manufacturing, mining, education, banking, insurance, communications, agriculture, construction, tea plantations… every nook and cranny of the labour force. It even drew in kiosk traders, street vendors, auto-rickshaw drivers, beedi rollers, domestic, casual and home-based workers. The leader of India’s biggest trade union federation the AITUC emphasized that “women’s participation in our strike was immense. They were in the forefront everywhere.” This colossal tsunami of struggle swept throughout a country where there are only 30 million organized trade union members! Since one in six people in the world live in India, and at least one in nine of these were on strike, this gigantic mass movement involved one in every fifty inhabitants of the planet!
There can be no way forward out of the torture of poverty, repression and war until the birth of a new mass party ready to mobilise the power of the workers from call centres to textile mills, the landless peasants and farm labourers, the women and the downtrodden, the exploited and unemployed of the shanty towns, linking arms across the entire sub-continent.
by Roger Silverman
Oaklandsocialist comments: Basically, what the author – Roger Silverman – has explained is how the theory of permanent, or uninterrupted, revolution applies to India. For those interested in this approach, see how it applies to Venezuela and Syria.
Categories: Asia, Marxist theory, Tuls Gabbard
Reblogged this on Taking Sides.