socialist movement

Gaza, Ukraine and the shaky ethics of the international left

Gaza and Ukraine exacerbate the ethical problem of an already shaky international left!

By Yorgos Mitralias

The revelation of the enormous ethical problem caused to the international left by the Russian war in Ukraine and the Israeli war in Gaza, is shaking it to such an extent that it is losing its internationalist and humanist compass, in other words, its very raison d’être! With the inevitable and nightmarish consequence to pave the way to the more or less fascist international far right!

For example, a majority of this international left, while opposing the Russian invasion of Ukraine, advocates refraining from any aid that would enable Ukrainians to defend themselves and repel the invaders. Emblematic of this position is the March 7, 2024 editorial in the Greek daily Efimerida ton Syntakton (Newspaper of the Editors), which begins by recalling that ”it is well known that the Mitsotakis government has involved our country to the maximum in the Russian-Ukrainian war by sending arms to UkraineIt did not content itself with legitimate condemnation of the Russian invasion“. Here, what’s shocking is not only the extreme hypocrisy of the editorial, which considers “legitimate” the condemnation of the Russian invasion, while denouncing the sending of arms Ukraine needs to counter this same Russian invasion, as if Ukrainians could fight the Russian invasion without weapons, with slingshots or … bare hands. However, far more shocking is the phrase “It did not content itself with legitimate condemnation of the Russian invasion“, which in fact recommends that we adopt a self-righteous “way of life” in which emotion and anger at the injustice suffered by others should avoid at all costs acts of tangible solidarity, and “settle” for anodyne verbal condemnations, such as those to which our rulers and their regimes are accustomed. In other words, we’re advised to adopt a “way of life” that boils down to the reactionary – and purely capitalist-inspired – adage “think only of yourself and don’t give a damn about anyone else.

The sad thing is not just that all this is being told to us by the country’s only left-wing daily. What’s revolting is that this self-righteous “way of life” is being sold to us as a kind of supreme… left-wing value, a kind of left-wing compass that can guide us through these confused times! In other wordsthe most cynical and reactionary petty-bourgeois amoralism, which elevates to the rank of virtue the most selfish indifference to the fate and suffering of others, the poor, the oppressed and the unprotected, is here transformed into a… moral compass that should guide the steps, behavior and lives of left-wing people! Conclusion: what a downfall, but also what a failure of the left and left-wingers, who are drifting and shipwrecked in foreign and inhospitable waters…

However, a similar ethical deficit and a similar problem are also evident in the attitude of many on the Left to Israel’s genocidal war against the Palestinian people. And the unfortunate thing is that this problem has taken on enormous dimensions in Israel and the Diaspora. That is, precisely where the Left could and should play a decisive role in the struggle for an immediate ceasefire and the withdrawal of the Israeli army from Gaza and the occupied territories, as well as in supporting the Palestinians and their right to life and freedom.

This is a tragic and at the same time catastrophic development, similar to that which forever marked the international left in the week following the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914: the same withdrawal, literally overnight, of the vast majority of people on the Left in defense of their nation-state, the same demonstration of exacerbated patriotism, the same rallying to the armed defenders of the fatherland, and the same betrayal of the oaths of eternal fidelity to internationalist and humanist principles that some had been accustomed to making for decades. And, as in the case of Russia’s war against Ukraine, the same scandalous  selfish indifference to the fate and suffering of others, the poor, the oppressed and the unprotected”, namely the Palestinians!

It’s no coincidence that in an article emblematic of this attitude, written by a well-known left-wing journalist, entitled “Israel is at a critical crossroads“, published on April 2 by a Greek business daily, Israel’s present and future are mentioned without the slightest reference and without a single word(!) being devoted to the destruction of Gaza and its tens of thousands of dead civilians! As if all this not only didn’t concern Israel, which provoked it and continues to do so, but didn’t have a crucial impact on its own present and future! And what’s more, the same article seems to be suffering from a sudden loss of memory, as it repeats that all the suffering began exclusively… on October 7 with the Hamas terrorist attack, as if the 76-year occupation of Palestinian land and the daily inhuman oppression of Palestinians by the Israeli state, which denies them the most basic democratic rights and freedoms, had never happened.

But there’s also something serious enough to go unnoticed, which differentiates the current betrayals from the – alas, very many – past betrayals of internationalist and humanist oaths by the Left and people on the Left. Indeed, unlike in the past, no one can now say that they didn’t know and didn’t see the daily display of barbarity by their own state, in order to justify their attitude. From now on, all systematic and planned “patriotic” atrocities are broadcast “live”, and no-one can hide behind alleged ignorance of the incredible suffering inflicted on Ukrainians, and even more so on Palestinian civilians, by their Russian and Israeli executioners…

Just as, moreover, none of the Israeli and diasporic leftists can justify their attitude by hiding behind the crimes of Hamas and invoking the absence of an alternative, when even the Israeli media can no longer keep quiet and evoke the case of at least one Israeli who, like another Karl Liebknecht in faraway Berlin in August 1914, publicly protests, even alone, against the so sad and frightening warmongering “national unity” of his compatriots. This is the courageous young Israeli internationalist Ben Arad, who is in fact saving the honor of the entire Israeli and international left, by publicly declaring that he chooses to go to prison here and now rather than perform his compulsory military service in an Israeli army distinguished by its genocidal operations and countless war crimes! (1) And of course, it’s no coincidence that Ben Arad willingly assumes the label of “traitor” that his compatriots have not failed to hurl at him, nor that on his balcony flies not the national flag with blue the Star of David, but the red flag once waved by so many great Jewish internationalist revolutionaries…

But in reality, it is the international left as a whole that is shaken by a major ethical crisis, as it is divided into two camps characterized by their symmetrical amoralism: that of the supporters of the Ukrainian resistance who do not support the Palestinian resistance. And those who support the Palestinians but refuse to support the Ukrainians. The consequences of this situation are obvious and predictable: a total lack of credibility and the inevitable bankruptcy of the Left, which keeps applying double standards, despite the fact that the wars of extermination launched by Putin’s Russia and Netanyahu’s Israel against the Ukrainian and Palestinian peoples have far more similarities than differences. After all, Russia’s Foreign Minister and Putin’s right-hand man, Sergei Lavrov, would not contradict us when he insists categorically that“Israel pursues similar objectives to Russia“, since it is doing in Gaza what Russia is doing in Ukraine (2)….

Notes

1. See the excellent CNN video “Israeli teen opens up about choosing jail over military service”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhzEDGmWJV4

2. See our article Sergei LavrovRussian Foreign Minister: ” Israel pursues objectives similar to those of Russia “: https://againstthecurrent.org/sergei-lavrov-israel-pursues-objectives-similar-to-those-of-russia/


Discover more from Oakland Socialist

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Categories: socialist movement

3 replies »

    • This whole business of equating a strategy of acts of individual terrorism with “right to resist” is completely mistaken. It would be one thing if Palestinian farmers in the West Bank were armed and decided to resist the attacks of the settlers when those farmers went to harvest their olives. But random attacks on individuals, even groups of individuals, is completely different. In fact, it’s always historically been used as a cover for refusing to organize and mobilize masses of people to fight on their own behalf. Nor should we forget that Fatah and the PLO in general went from the strategy of individual terrorism to where the Palestine Authority is today – more or less capitulating to Israel. And that is the history of groups that utilize this method around the world.

  1. I broadly agree with the main post (above): in both situations we have two national peoples, one historically colonially subjugated by the state of the other. An ongoing war of attempted conquest and occupation. Devastating air strikes, bombardment of civilian targets, cutting off access to utilities and humanitarian aid. An authoritarian leader who continually denies the legitimacy of the subjugated people’s national identity and right to self-determination.

    As Ukrainian activist and writer Daria Saburova put it, “How can we look at images of Gaza and not see Mariupol or Bakhmut?” Those who oppose Russia’s war and support Ukraine’s right to self-determination should oppose Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and its blockade and current siege of Gaza, and support the Palestinian people’s right to their own state.

    When Hamas launched its attacks against Israel on 7 October, several commentators on the UK and international left immediately drew comparisons with Ukraine, arguing that those who supported Ukraine’s military resistance to Russian occupation should support (what they saw as) Hamas’s military resistance to Israeli occupation.

    Socialists should support Palestinians’ right to resist. That includes the right to take up arms against the occupying military, and to defend themselves against military attack. But that general principle does not imply endorsement for all actions undertaken in the name of “resistance”, by no-matter-what political force.

    Young people at a music festival, elderly men and women, and tiny children are not an occupying military. And Hamas is not fighting to win Palestinian self-determination on an equal basis to Israeli Jews. Its stated aim is for a theocratic state in all of pre-1948 Palestine, purged of Jews.

    An analogy would arise if a far-right Ukrainian militia was conducting incursions into Russia itself, slaughtering Russian civilians, taking Russian civilian hostages, all on the basis of a political programme explicitly advocating the destruction of Russia. There is no such situation in Ukraine, nor any prospect of one — but if there was, there is no socialist or anti-imperialist principle that could possibly justify support for it.

    These views are often met with the retort that non-Palestinians have no right to “tell Palestinians how to resist”. But by refusing to oppose Hamas, socialists are not somehow “remaining neutral” on the question of “how Palestinians should resist”, but endorsing the efforts of one current — one of the most reactionary in Palestinian society — to make its “resistance” the dominant one. What about the many Palestinians who oppose Hamas, who advocate a different kind of “resistance”, on a different political basis?

    There is surely a political opportunity to make links between the Ukrainian and Palestinian struggles — and not just these, but also the struggles of other peoples fighting for the win or retain their right to self-determination: Kurds, Uyghurs, Tibetans, Hong Kongers, Taiwanese, West Papuans, Saharawis, Chechens, and others. But those linkages, if they are to help advance socialist politics, have to be made on the basis of consistent democracy, the advocacy of equal democratic rights for all peoples. Misleading comparisons, based on a fetishisation of any military resistance, even for reactionary aims, serve no-one’s struggles (NB I am *not* making that accusation against the author of the main post, but it does apply to many on the left).

Leave a Reply