Site icon Oakland Socialist

ISIS K attack in Moscow: first thoughts

Al Jazeera is giving credibility to ISIS (ISIL) K’s taking responsibility for this terrorist attack. This group has a long history of attacking Russian targets due, first and foremost, to Russia’s role in Syria. They also claimed credit for some terrorist attacks in Iran, which also supports the Assad dictatorship. Putin is claiming that Ukraine was indirectly involved in that they supposedly had arranged a “window” for the escape of the ISIS K attackers. I very, very much doubt this.
One question is whether Putin will try to use this as a pretext to move towards a general mobilization for his war against Ukraine. The other side of the question is to what degree will this seriously weaken Putin domestically. After all, his whole base of support inside Russia has been based on the claim that he has provided stability and security. Now, that claim is literally up in flames, especially so since the US warned against exactly such an attack and Putin dismissed that warning as being a “provocation”.
We also should be aware that the “West” – the US included – is not necessarily immune from such attacks. If one happens inside the US – or at a US target outside the US (e.g. a military base) – I think it will strengthen Trump. That would also serve the interests of ISIS and all other Muslim nationalist groups. These reactionary nationalist forces all reinforce each other; they provide a basis for the existence of each other.
A lot more to be said as we learn more about this.

I also talked with Ilya Budraitskis, Russian refugee living in Berkeley, CA. Here is what he said:

Exit mobile version